Relativismo

Relativism is sometimes identified (solitamente dai suoi critici) come tesi secondo cui tutti i punti di vista sono ugualmente validi. Nell'etica, ciò equivale a dire che tutte le morali sono ugualmente buone; in epistemologia implica che tutte le credenze, o sistemi di credenze, sono ugualmente vere. Critics of relativism typically dismiss such views as incoherent since they imply the validity even of the view that relativism is false. They also charge that such views are pernicious since they undermine the enterprise of trying to improve our ways of thinking.

Perhaps because relativism is associated with such views, few philosophers are willing to describe themselves as relativists. Tuttavia, most of the leading thinkers who have been accused of relativism–for example, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Pietro Winch, Thomas Kuhn, Riccardo Rorty, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida–do share a certain common ground which, while recognizably relativistic, provides a basis for more sophisticated, and perhaps more defensible, positions.

Although there are many different kinds of relativism, they all have two features in common.

(1) They all assert that one thing (per esempio. moral values, bellezza, conoscenza, taste, or meaning) is relative to some particular framework or standpoint (per esempio. the individual subject, a culture, an era, a language, or a conceptual scheme).

(2) They all deny that any standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others.

It is thus possible to classify the different types and sub-types of relativism in a fairly obvious way. The main genera of relativism can be distinguished according to the object they seek to relativize. Così, forms of moral relativism assert the relativity of moral values; forms of epistemological relativism assert the relativity of knowledge. These genera can then be broken down into distinct species by identifying the framework to which the object in question is being relativized. Per esempio, moral subjectivism is that species of moral relativism that relativizes moral value to the individual subject.

How controversial, and how coherent, these forms of relativism are will obviously vary according to what is being relativized to what, and in what manner. In contemporary philosophy, the most widely discussed forms of relativism are moral relativism, cognitive relativism, and aesthetic relativism.

Informazioni sull'autore

Emrys Westacott
E-mail: [email protected]
Alfred University
U. S. UN.