Legal Pragmatism Legal pragmatism is a theory critical of more traditional pictures of law and, genauer, judicial decision-making. The classical view of law offers a case-based theory of law that emphasizes the universal and foundational quality of specifically legal facts, the meticulous analysis of precedent and argument from analogy. Legal pragmatism, andererseits, emphasizes the need to include a more diverse set

Locke: Erkenntnistheorie John Locke (1632-1704), einer der Begründer des britischen Empirismus, ist berühmt dafür, dass er darauf beharrt, dass alle unsere Ideen aus Erfahrung stammen, und dass er die Notwendigkeit empirischer Beweise betont. Er entwickelt seine empiristische Erkenntnistheorie in einem Essay über menschliches Verständnis, was spätere Empiriker wie George Berkeley und David Hume stark beeinflusste. In diesem Artikel, Lockes Essay dient zur Erläuterung seiner Kritik

Bernard Mandeville (1670–1733) Bernard Mandeville is primarily remembered for his impact on discussions of morality and economic theory in the early eighteenth century. His most noteworthy and notorious work is The Fable of the Bees, which triggered immense public criticism at the time. He had a particular influence on philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment, most notably Francis Hutcheson, David Hume, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Adam Smith.

Religious Pluralism Religious pluralism, weit ausgelegt, is a response to the diversity of religious beliefs, Praktiken Methoden Ausübungen, and traditions that exist both in the contemporary world and throughout history. The terms “pluralism” and “pluralist” can, depending on context or intended use, signify anything from the mere fact of religious diversity to a particular kind of philosophical or theological approach to such diversity, one usually characterized by

Chrysippus (c. 280—207 B.C.E.) Chrysippus was among the most influential philosophers of the Hellenistic period. He is usually thought of as the most important influence on Stoicism. A later Stoic catchphrase ran, “If Chrysippus had not existed, neither would the Stoa.” (Lives 292). Carneades, the fourth Chair of the New Academy, modified the phrase to, “If Chrysippus had not existed, neither would I.” (Lives 438)